- Stelpher 2m
- Baron17 1m
- Neekly 3s
- crashdown 10m
- ComradeNitro 25s
- Kuzco 26s Character art http://i63.tinypic.com/t0jiiv.jpg
- Fire 31s
- Marioanius 1m Talk less, smile more.
- Ghostinthekeys 2m
- Malakai 4m
- himble 42m youtu.be/og243Dom4Sw
- Manywaters 18s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TL1ByAIf8Ck
- gashess 9m
- Dorn 6m youtu.be/7OUqUiZQxs4
- coconut 30m
- SacredWest 1h
- Newbs21 46m We're all crazy here!
- Vera 14s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maAFcEU6atk
- Barrien 26m
- waddlerafter 3s youtu.be/jZitWKRvTtU
- Jain 36s
- Valentine 1m
- attaboy 1m
j Johnny 20s New Code Written Nightly. Not a GM.
- Trakel 2m
- Malanth 1m
- jsmith225 3h
And 22 more hiding and/or disguised
Connect to Sindome @ moo.sindome.org:5555 or just Play Now

The Right Thing: A Bannable Offense

DOING THE RIGHT THING - NOW A BANNABLE OFFENSE

Given that I am freshly the recipient of this punishment, little known to me, I felt that I should take the opportunity to do the community a service by warning you about . Hopefully, you may avoid it yourselves. I have nothing else to do but write in blank shock now that I've been banned through the rest of the year by Jinx.

Those of you who would know me would be most familiar with me on the OOC channel as Sybele. I've been playing Sindome for a while now, I was on staff very briefly, and I generally loved the game to pieces. My contributions to it in terms of descriptive work, money, and time were pretty liberal while I was there. I also made a lion's share of mistakes, dominated mostly by an inability to keep a given character for very long. However, the one I was about to give up (with one staffer wishing me luck with my suicide) was an example of a growing exception to the rule. She had lasted for several months, and sought out many opportunities before I made the choice to retire her. A staff quote:

"Getting tired of a character for OOC reasons that have nothing to do with OOCly wanting to escape IC conflicts or debts, and wanting to stop playing them and play a new one, is totally legitimate."

The retirement isn't really the point, though. Everyone knew I was going to do that and nobody was standing in my way. Where did it go wrong? Well, I had asked for a corporate immigrant at one point in time as my next PC. This was denied - fine, answer accepted - and then something else came down the line about having to switch between Mixer and corporate characters as a rule. I had never heard of this rule before, having primarily played people who immigrated and went to Gold, and I'd never had it enforced upon me. When last night finally came and my character had exhausted their reasons to stay any longer, I prepared for departure. There was just one thing to clear up.

The above mentioned rule, which I did not fully understand, remained a concern. Certain staff members who might read their emails will know that I had no plans to beg for a corporate immigrant. They'll know exactly which two concepts I had in mind.

I emailed them to inquire as to whether I clearly understood this rule on having to be a Mixer forever, so that I would make the proper character concept choices for my preferences. Forever is a long time, after all. The answer to this attempt to follow Cerberus and Johnny's ruling was not bothersome. The answer was binary: A or B, 0 or 1, yes or no. It did not attempt to argue against nor bend their opinions. It did not ask for a corporate immigrant. It did not complain.

I sent this request for clarification to the help address as I prepared to recreate, but it wasn't Cerberus or Johnny who answered me. It was Jinx. After going on a diatribe about how I was a bother to staff and how my characters didn't last for more than two weeks (again, the retiring character having lasted for some months), I was given a two week ban. Naturally, I defended myself, feeling assured that there must have been some sort of misunderstanding here. Surely, I could not have been banned or bothersome for emailing them in order to *do the right thing* by confirming my understanding of a ruling of the Head GM and Chief of Staff.

Turns out, that was exactly what was happening. No other explanation has ever been given to me as I tried to defend myself. At one point, Jinx recoiled slightly (perhaps realizing the harshness) and reduced the ban to one week so that I could "consider what my Mixer would be" - the staffers who mattered knew my fleshed out concepts already. It was just a matter of how to interpret that rule I was inquiring about. Forever Mixer, no matter what, or not? Unfortunately, as email time dating can confirm, Jinx sent this bit of mercy at the same time I forwarded my prior reply to Helpers, having forgotten to include them in my last response.

Jinx evidently took this as a chance to sweep aside that small show of mercy and make things worse, and worse, and inexplicably worse yet. Each time Jinx escalated the ban in response to my defending my attempts to email only in search of the proper ruling on creation, the ban was extended. Eventually, Jinx announced "going exponential" on me. Now, the ban time would multiply instead of simply accumulate week by week.

Why, you ask, wouldn't I simply stop at this point? Why not take the months and stop them from growing? I didn't because in this context, I had done nothing wrong and felt I had every right to defend myself. Rather than breaking the rules or bothering anyone, I was making certain that I did the *right* thing according to head staff's wishes in the creation of my next character.

So, I continued to defend myself. At this point, Jinx's dialogue has deteriorated to nothing more than citing how long the ban now is per my last message. There was apparently some desire to smash my face in with the ban hammer, and my knock at the proverbial door to ask a well-meaning question was all the invitation required to do so.

At last count, my ban was up to 32 months. After this, I'm sure it will be a full year or more, but I steadfastly maintain that the right hing to do was seek a clear answer.. My appeal for other staff members to stop this inexplicable punishment prompted a circling of the wagons. I was actually being punished because my single email, the first one which only sought clarity in policy, was bothersome. A simple 'yes' or 'no' would have peacefully resolved things on the very first reply, but instead, we get this.

This, for a long time member of the community who has admittedly made a great many mistakes, but who has also been a generous contributor in many respects and someone whose most paramount prior failing had gradually but surely improved with time.

This, for someone whose only crime in this instance was trying to make sure Cerberus and Johnny were fully understood before a new character was made, so that the character would be made properly. A year, maybe more, because I defended myself as trying to make certain I did what the head staffers wanted me to do. I literally asked nothing more than that, and now I am given an immense ban and period of separation from the community I love and with which I share my days.

The only sense I can make out of this insanity is to warn you that, evidently, trying to do the right thing is now a bannable offense. Bothering them with trying to get the correct and proper answer, even if it's a yes or no and requests nothing special, is a bannable offense. Asking for confirmation on an official level first cost me my access to the game for such a span of time. My emails seeking to ensure that I was doing as they wished mean I will not see you all again until, at best, after the holiday season.

I'm not even going to get into the exchanges I had with the few staffers who did reply. I'm outranked, I can't help you, stop emailing me (after I was able to prove more was said to me than they evidently relaized), etcetera. Nobody wanted to try and confront a $Justice who was levying a huge ban upon a player for the crime of emailing to ensure they did what was expected of them in chargen.

At last contact, I was told the rule I'd broken was now to "not email" even though emailing was the [/b]*only way*[/b] to confirm I was doing what was wanted of me in this specific instance. Being told 'no corporate immigrants' was not the only thing said to me in the past. It was implied that there was a rule about having to alternate between corporate and permanent Mixer characters, without regard to immigration method. To quote, and this was after I had abandoned a corporate immigrant concept:

"If you kill your corpie off, you will start as a mixer. It’s how we do things. You have yet to actually play a mixer (poster's note: untrue several times over). You just get out of the mix as fast as you can. Remember, I suggested your yak princess (poster's note: idea related to a concept while I was on staff) would live in the mix, not the corpie areas. I apologize if I personally misled you, I failed to think about the stance we have on ‘always a corpie’. When Cerberus asked if that was still the policy, I had to confirm it was."

That last line implies that one of my two concept options, which involved starting as a Mixer and moving up, might have been against the rules and would certainly have impacted my creation decisions. I was never aware of any 'always a corpie' policy or stance stance, having usually played corporate characters, hence my pursuit of clarity. I've fessed up to having made a lot of prior errors. Trying to ensure that I made a new character in full understanding of Cerberus/Johnny's parameters was not one of them. Emailing, the only route to understanding, was a mistake - in staff's eyes.

TLDR: My punisment is now up to 32 weeks. That's pretty much one year - 2016 - before I get to see you guys again, over a well meaning A or B answer which could've been settled in the very first reply to my very first email.

All that's left to say, I guess, is that Sybele's player will deeply miss you all.

Well this certainly help your case.

Can I haz edit?

I was told the rule I'd broken was now to "not email" even though emailing was the *only way*[/b] to confirm I was doing what was wanted of me [/b]

You were told several times to stop emailing. Every time your ban was extended you were told that the reason for it was that you were ignoring the instruction to stop emailing. Every time you were told exactly what the consequence would be of continuing to email. Every time you were told that the next email would double the duration of your ban.

You've experienced this before. You can't possibly have thought that Jinx didn't mean it.

Again, your reply ignores that the only way I was able to communicate my wish for clarity was to send an email requesting it. That was the manner in which the point of confusion was conveyed in the first place. In that light, there is no crime in my emailing, and it shouldn't have been punished straightaway. A chance should've been given for an answer, seeing as I was holding off on creation to do the right thing.

With respect to this helping my case, you've already refused to continue addressing the matter even though I was only trying to do what you and Johnny wanted, Cerberus.

After so long, I at least wanted to give an account and say goodbye to my dear friends on the game. There are quite a few who I'll miss deeply.

One more time with more OOMPH.

Well actually this isn't the first time you get increasingly bigger ban for emailing staff.

The first one happened on a "one extra day per email" basis. It got up to 21 days.

This one I reduced you from a permaban to a week because your email while a violation had a question that I answered. Not feeling happy with my answer you kept emailing even when my email explicitly stated that this was not a discussion and that every subsequent email would result in another week added to your ban.

Still, you kept emailing, so I made the penalty exponential instead of simply a sum...

Yet you kept emailing, now it is not 32 weeks. It is a permanent ban. Have a nice life.

I'm sorry to hear that this has transitioned to permanency.

The ultimate point of the original post stands. I will deeply miss the many friends I have made within the community. To borrow a phrase from Jinx, only with the sincerest meaning, have a nice life.

Just to refresh the @rules:

2.G Admin Harassment

Administrators are not to be abused, accused or harassed on-MOO or off-MOO. help@sindome.org is for making respectful complaints about personal problems with specific admins or engaging in long-form communication at the request of a specific admin. Bans will be levied against anyone that breaks these rules.

In my case, that seems to not have applied. I utilized help@sindome.org in order to ensure that I would be acting in compliance with something said to me by one of the highest staff members on the game. The result is obviously what it was, though the answer was sought via a benign message.

Concerning the above image with my emails, I don't exactly see the relevance. I note some emails on personal brainstorming regarding future concepts which I thought might abide by your specific wants in my case, yes. I also note emails containing requested descriptive information for the game happily contributed, GM applications (the evils of wanting to try one's hand at volunteering, whether good at it or not), and invited conversations I am not entirely certain were directed at the person posting. I used the @note system or xhelp more often to communicate matters of import.

Only thing I ever wanted was an answer on A) yes, Mixer must be forever, or B) no, Mixer must not be forever. There was an obsession with my playing a Mixer in the long term, and Johnny had made some sort of policy reference he said he had to confirm for Cerberus in the past, so I emailed to make certain I understood my situation.

I should add that there's a certain irony in the suggestion of using the email address. I used it to try and respect head staff's wishes and avoid trouble, and it got me banned. It was evident not a valid route of communication for me, whether for complaints or for trying to abide by whatever rules had been set upon me personally.

"... I am not entirely certain were directed at the person posting."

Sorry for the spam, folks. I took another look at that image and, indeed, many of those emails were not directed at the person posting the image. I wouldn't want anyone to be given the false impression that I was obsessively emailing this individual.

To the contrary, Cerberus and I were like oil and water, to the point where staffers like Johnny could likely tell you that I dreaded having to address him with anything negative. He has his reasons for being on edge which I acknowledge and empathize with, but of all people, I would not have been in constant contact with him. In this specific case, there was contact directed to him and Johnny (via the help email) because I knew they were the two specific staffers somehow involved in the decision I was concerned with.

Johnny, I considered a friend and had for a long time. I did email him a good deal, often with building data, sometimes seeking advice or to discuss something.

Missing all of you a great deal. The days aren't quite the same without getting to say hey to you in the mornings and good night in the early AM. I'm looking for a replacement for my time, given that I can't exactly go far, but I doubt you lot could be replaced.

Stop posting on this topic, the discussion is closed. You were warned and didn't heed your warning and reaped the repercussion of your actions.

If you keep spamming the forums with your ramblings I will ban you from it as well.