- Mory 51s http://www.novelupdates.com
- VeryWellLost 1m
- Stiza13 18s
- CabbageOverlord 2m
w Storm 17s I dabble in the puppeting.
- Java 52s
- Atheran 47s
- Malakai 23m
- Jade1202 8m
- Praxus 1s
- Dawnshot 1m https://youtu.be/qg_7saEbnwE
c Mephisto 38m Malt doch nicht immer den Teufel an die Wand.
- Puciek 3m Troubled newbie on the block
- Grizzly666 36s youtu.be/nSuregWhlWk
- BCingyou 13m
- Grey0 17s
- pfh 27m
- Baguette 7m ye boi
- Evie 1s
- WHYTENINJA96 10m Good lord. Good golly. Good grief.
- Rabajoie 1h
- Warlord203 12s
- RatchetEffect 40s
- Cosmic 3s
j Johnny 7h New Code Written Nightly. Not a GM.
- jsmith225 2s
j Kwisatz 13h Definitely not a GM.
And 28 more hiding and/or disguised
Connect to Sindome @ moo.sindome.org:5555 or just Play Now

Sleep SICing
is a topic for the Ideas channel!

So here it is! How about a system that allows you to SIC asleep characters such that you can't tell whether someone is logged off or not, since not all logged off characters are ICly asleep?

If they're not on "who", you can't SIC them.

Just because a given alias is not on "who" doesn't mean the character isdisconnected. Or even in brownout.

The idea sounds like a MUCH bigger pain in the ass than the problem it's aimed to solve. 50% of all game activity would turn into "Didn't you get my message?"

Putting disconnected players' characters on "who" seems wrong.

The idea would be to have it go hand in hand with the one on the sleep places thread regarding letting idle people also disappear off of whodata. And to have sleeping players receive said SICs when they are logged onto.

Of course, then you turn from one suspension of disbelief to another, as you'd have to forgive players for their characters' having been busy doing something else and being unable to respond to SIC.