WebClient Not For You?
An open discussion of what you need in a client

I sometimes play in a slow connection and the webclient seems to have a lower timeout time than, say, VMoo, which will patiently wait until my connection catches up before loading the next chunk of buffer. I will constantly have to refresh the webclient (i.e. the page has to load all over again) in this instance and for me it's more convenient to use a client which only has to handle reconnection to the MOO.

Now, don't get me wrong. The webclient is otherwise perfect. I love it in every aspect. However sometimes it doesn't just cut it for me :)

I use the webclient whenever possible.

However, the webclient seems to be more resource (CPU and Memory) and data heavy then a simple client. It also seems to be more sensitive to patchy connections. So I might break out a simple mud client when I know I'm traveling through patchy areas, using a low end device, low on data and the like.

When I first started Sindome I still played a few other MOO/MUDs and I preferred to have one client for them all. But all others have been left behind so it's no longer a concern.

Lastly, I remember having the webclient sometimes work well and sometimes not work at all on my phone. So I eventually just decided to use a simple client on it as data and spotty connectivity were already concerns anyways.

I have one key reason to use Mudlet instead - it automatically logs all my roleplay directly to my pc, split by days.

When I try using the client linked from the website it's unusable for me, it's like there's some kind of overlay that I can't seem to get rid of.

The https://pubclient.sindome.org/ works on the other hand but I get these blank squares showing up as text on chrome, so I use firefox... which can lag and crash out when I highlight text.