Reset Password
Existing players used to logging in with their character name and moo password must signup for a website account.
- AdamBlue9000 56s Rolling 526d6 damage against both of us.
- Majere_Draven 15s
- Fogchild1 2m
- zxq 5s
- Wonderland 15s
- Burgerwolf 1m PRETZELS
- Baguette 55s waow
- gssmr 2h
a Mench 1h Doing a bit of everything.
- BelladonnaRP 1m
- JMo 0s Nothin' to see here.
- adrognik 4m
- Hek 31m
- Soft_kitty 22s
- Coris5271 2h
- zeezenfrozen 28m mood:
- Xanithar 6h
- Slyter 1h
And 23 more hiding and/or disguised
Connect to Sindome @ or just Play Now

Sindome is a privilege
It is not a right

Hey Folx,

I'm writing this because I want to make it clear that we will do not tolerate trolls and bad actors in our community. As more people have joined the community there has been an uptick in people who show up, cause trouble OOCly, pretend they are acting in good faith, and waste a bunch of staff and player time.

TLDR: Each individual is responsible for their behavior and their character. If their behavior violates our rules or causes harm to the community they will be removed from the community.

Over the years we have gotten much better at identifying and tracking these patterns of behavior in people, and removing them from our community. We have gotten stricter, and less forgiving of poisonous behavior.

In the past we have given folx a large number chances to change their behavior before we finally resort to suspension or perma-ban, and we will continue to offer second chances, where applicable. However, we will not be the endless well of patience we have been in the past.

This does not mean we will not welcoming to new players. People who are new to MUDs/MOOs, and are having trouble understanding the theme or rules will always get the support they need.

That being said, there have been times where the staff have dedicated hours of coaching and conversation with players (new and old) who have been breaking the rules, violating the theme, arguing on xhelp, back-seat GMing, leaving shitty notes about RP they were involved in, etc. In some cases the hours of time put in have paid off and the player was able to turn a corner, more often though, are times where those efforts fell on deaf ears, resulting in even more frustration from the staff and a decrease in the time that those staff members were able to provide to players who were not causing issues or acting in bad faith.

We want the game to be fair and accessible to all, however, there are people who lack the maturity to be members of our community and we need to be honest with ourselves about that.

When we play the 'endless patience' game, more often than not, the result is a haggard staff, and a player base that isn't getting the attention it deserves because the staff is spending 6 hours a day arguing with bad actors on xhelp about how their behavior violates the rules or is bad for the game while the player in question pretends they don't have any clue that their behavior was causing these issues, despite being spoken to about it multiple times.

Some people want to play Sindome like a single-player game. This is not a single player game. Each player is one of hundreds who all require attention. Requiring 10x the attention of another player is bad for the game as a whole. We need to continue to steer clear of a world where a small set of players require a disproportionate amount of hand holding, warning, and other staff attention.

Here are some examples of the behavior that will get someone classified as a troll or a bad actor:

1. breaking the rules over and over and pretending like you didn't know you were doing so

2. being aggressive to staff on xhelp/email when they attempt to talk to you

3. being passive aggressive to staff on xhelp / email

4. being aggressive in @notes

5. being passive aggressive in @notes

6. lying to the staff

7. creating troll accounts

8. being a jerk on the BGBB

9. being a jerk on OOC/game help

10. using hate speech OOCly

11. circumventing suspensions

12. continuing with behavior you have been asked to cease by a staff member

13. cheating

14. flaming

15. refusing to acknowledge xhelps

16. taking issue with anything and everything a staff member tells you

17. repeatedly claiming others are cheating with no proof

18. failing to accept / arguing OOCly about IC outcomes

19. farming

20. sponging UE

21. refusing to RP because certain players are online

22. acting in bad faith

23. needing constant attention from the staff to advise/warn/correct your OOC or IC behavior

24. playing the game drunk/high and trying to use that as an excuse for poor OOC behavior

25. attempting to solicit better outcomes from the staff because you have made a donation to the game (expecting to pay to win)

26. using IRL hardships to justify blowing up at staff or breaking the rules

27. expecting special treatment from staff because of your IC job/role

28. expecting special treatment from staff because you believe you create a lot of RP

29. deliberately making the job of the volunteer staff more difficult

30. expecting the admin to break the rules to 'prove' what they are saying is true

31. not accepting 'it's IC' when you xhelp with a query/problem/issue.

32. treating the admin as if they are out to get you, and acting like the burden of proving that they aren't is on staff.

And the list goes on. We are simply not going to tolerate this behavior. If you are exhibiting this behavior, please stop. If you are just arriving to Sindome, please recognize that the behaviors outlined above, while not an exhaustive list, do accurately capture what we consider poor behavior in our community, and exhibiting said behavior will quickly result in a suspension of your access to the game, and possibly a permanent removal from our community.

If you have any questions about this, please reply in this thread and I will clarify either in a response or by editing my original post.

-- Slither

I'll be the first to admit I have a history of writing very aggressive @notes when I'm angry at something. Not terribly often, but they've happened. At some point I started labeling these particular logs with the 'Self' tag and filing them all under the name 'Vent Sesh'.

Not long after, I discovered a BGBB post about bleed, and I think that's really helped round a corner with a particular fault I've identified with myself - allowing my character's helplessness to make me feel helpless.

In any case, I'm just wanting to clarify if that kind of note - one clearly titled for myself and labeled appropriately to manage bleed when it happens (as that's become one of the ways I manage it), is forbidden under this code.

Labeling it as self doesn't stop it from popping up for GMs. So if you don't want them to have to interact with it, it may be better to keep it off the MOO. For now though, I will say that marking it as 'self' and labeling it as a vent sesh is acceptable. Though I reserve the right to change our policy on this if the GMs express a frustration with it.
acting in bad faith

What does this one mean?

The phrase “acting in bad faith” typically means not playing according to the spirit of the rules. There is the letter if the law and there is a spirit of the law. Since faith and spirit typically goes together, one can translate that phrase with the spirit of the rules phrase. For further clarification, they admin basically wants you to be understanding and trying tour best as a player to make this experience enjoyable for everyone. In the staff’s own words as stated in another section, one could say “Don’t act in bad faith” could mean “Don’t be a dick.”
Yeah, sort of.

Acting in bad faith as a general principle is basically a kind of deception. Think of it as a situation where someone is paying lip service, or pretending.

A Sindome example might be a staff member questioning a player about a sketchy IC situation where a player abused some combat mechanic knowingly to gain an advantage in a fight, maybe some exploit or just something the admin have repeatedly asked players not to do because it breaks things, is against the rules, etc.

That player responds saying they just didn't know it was bad to do that thing, or they did it accidentally, and just weren't otherwise aware they were doing something wrong -- when in fact they 100% knew and are just trying to avoid trouble. They aren't having a conversation 'in good faith', they aren't being honest.

This can apply in all kinds of ways. Slither is basically just saying, we're done dealing with players who aren't going to be honest and direct with us, there's just not enough time or emotional capital to spend on them.

Yep, both Nathanial and Jameson hit the nail on the head with their responses.
Gotcha. For some reason my brain thought this meant something IC. Thanks for the clarification. :)