Existing players used to logging in with their character name and moo password must signup for a website account.
- Wulf 5m
- Acupa 9m
- Lena 35s Yippee Ki-Yay
- whatislove 19m something witty here
- Burgerwolf 24s PANCAKES
- Mobius42 1m
- SmokePotion 27s Right or wrong, I'm getting high.
- Rillem 6m Make it personal.
- Vanashis 2m
- Darlene 10m
- Hivemind 2m
- xXShadowSlayerXx 1m
- Pladdicus 29m uh
- VermilionGrin 33s
a Mench 3h Doing a bit of everything.
- TwistedAkai 0s What? No, I'm completely innosint.
a Kard 6h
- Fogchild1 27m
- zxq 11m Tools: https://ansicolortool.neocities.org
- Fay 39m
- Raven 59m I lost myself, in the dark charade.
- Ociex 5m Brownies for the win.
And 23 more hiding and/or disguised
Sindomedome logo
a cyberpunk roleplaying game
banner art by Snook-8
Connect to Sindome @ moo.sindome.org:5555 or just Play Now
  • BgBB
  • Ideas
  • @check overload that shows teases
  • Because having to @check then @messages is weird

@check overload that shows teases
Because having to @check then @messages is weird

Login to post. Membership required.
Jump To
Newest Post
So I'd think a variant of @check with a similar interface too it, but which shows all of the clothes messages and the assorted information would be a good thing for tailors.

Something like an @check all "Sparkling Bedonged Vajazzled Diamondweave G-String Panties" would be a wonderful addition to the game. But maybe putting it in the form of a separate command might be better.

Any thoughts?

By RheaGhe at Jun 16, 2019, 11:07 AM | 0
I was thinking something like this, but simply adding the tease messages to the already existing list. I'd also like it if tease messages were able to be edited without refinishing the piece so they have more utility. In short you could use tailored clothing to store pre written messages that are relevant to your character at any given time or situation.
By Varolokkur at Jun 16, 2019, 11:11 AM | 0
Like Macros?
By Majere_Draven at Jun 16, 2019, 11:12 AM | 0
You mean @messages ?

By HolyChrome at Jun 16, 2019, 11:17 AM | 0
@messages is very poor at conveying the information, and doesn't include some of the other things that @check includes.
By RheaGhe at Jun 16, 2019, 11:25 AM | 0
Typically I just run @messages after I'm satisfied with @check to make sure everything's legit.

I can get behind the idea of adding the teases to the @check output if it's a line of code or something.

By Crooknose at Jun 16, 2019, 11:59 AM | 0
Jump To Oldest Post