We got data vaults, smaller e-mems, and threads asking for bigger ones.
But should consumers really just get a stable, available and permanent data storage solution at that size? What happens to corporate profits then, and sales of other modules?
So considering data vaults exist, which are big old terminals with big old memories, why not commercialize large scale memory banks?
I'm suggesting locations are implemented similar to those featuring rentable Lockers, except here you rent a locker, you pop it open, and once its 'open' you have access to what is essentially just a really, really big memory module you can copy things onto and off of, with a minimal readout to navigate the file system for file selection (the 'ls' command, largely) but not viewing.
These'd be really big modules, since it's basically just renting space on a big, compartmentalized data server, so people can get all their photos on there, but the corps aren't letting you have it for free, so you gotta keep paying.
This also helps contrast the benefit of corporations providing data vaults in their corporate premises to their employees for corporate work in comparison, while consumer solutions are monetized.
The modules should be really spacious to incentivize usage by difference in convenience, just like the limitations on e-mem modules incentivize it the other way, but can't serve to actually use/read/work with the data on them.
