Existing players used to logging in with their character name and moo password must signup for a website account.
- Sivartas 23s
- meero619 4s
- xXShadowSlayerXx 43s
- Rillem 21m Make it personal.
c Logic 48s
- Dale 8m
- Acupa 16m
- exovolt 9s
- cata 3m
- Diamond 49m After Winter, must come Spring.
- SmokePotion 9m Right or wrong, I'm getting high.
- baewulf 7m
- QueenZombean 15s Singing the song that doesn't end, yes it goes...
- BubbleKangaroo 16m
- zxq 1m Blackcastle was no ordinary prison.
- NightHollow 3m
- LadyLogic 31m
- Vanashis 1h
a Mench 1m Doing a bit of everything.
And 22 more hiding and/or disguised
Sindomedome logo
a cyberpunk roleplaying game
banner art by Grand Failure
Connect to Sindome @ moo.sindome.org:5555 or just Play Now
  • BgBB
  • Ideas
  • Nanogenic Booster Shots
  • These nanomachines aren't eternal, right?

Nanogenic Booster Shots
These nanomachines aren't eternal, right?

Login to post. Membership required.
Jump To
Newest Post
Suggestion: Make nanos expire after a year of having them, requiring characters to have to pay to get them again. Thus, you have to go in to the clinic to get your booster shots.

Just a simple idea along the lines of the 'chrome insurance.'

By alittlelonger at Jan 10, 2021, 11:56 AM | 0
I'm curious as to what purpose you feel this would serve the game. Not shooting the idea down, but I'd like to hear the rationale behind it.

Also where are these characters who survive a full year without visiting vats! XD

By MongOfTheWeek at Jan 10, 2021, 12:56 PM | 0
Yeah, bouncing off of Mong, death and dying seems to be a far better answer to this "problem".
By HolyChrome at Jan 10, 2021, 12:57 PM | 0
Who the hell goes a year without losing nanos…

Oh yeah - 45% of everybody.

/me boggles.

By beandip at Jan 10, 2021, 7:15 PM | 0
@beandip

Maybe not a year. I've played only a few months and never died, and I'm part of that poll.

@topic

I'm not sure why this should be a thing? The nanos I've seen are supposed to mutate your body, so it's more of a 'one and done' deal.

By BubbleKangaroo at Jan 10, 2021, 8:34 PM | 0
Nobody needs to lose more nanos, and those who don't lose them are characters who don't really use them much or really need them like…90% of topside and 50% of the Mix. So we could say most of the nano market is for vanity purposes and not practical ones.

I'd rather the players spent that extra flash of not needing booster shots in other players that aren't cyberdocs.

By GhostInTheMachine at Jan 11, 2021, 7:04 AM | 0
Just an opinion. If someone manages to live a year without getting vatted, good on them. Let them keep their nanos.
By Hek at Jan 11, 2021, 2:32 PM | 0
Agreed with most of the other comments; I think the system as-is is fine and makes sense – if the nanos altered your genetic makeup, then you're altered until you clone. It actually doesn't make sense that clone updating doesn't carry over the nano-boosts, but that's an obvious balance issue we just have to hand-wave.

By Jameson at Jan 11, 2021, 2:48 PM | 0
Some nanos do require ups, some do not, for balance. The rest FOIC.
By Dawnshot at Jan 11, 2021, 2:52 PM | 0
Jump To Oldest Post