Reset Password
Existing players used to logging in with their character name and moo password must signup for a website account.
- Manywaters 4s youtu.be/AAbokV76tkU
- crashdown 13m
c Butako 1m Butakooooo the builder. Can she fix it? Eh.
- White 35s I am just a boy.
- Stelpher 7m
- waddlerafter 0s
- Strummer 24s
- Grizzly666 22s Oh no! I lost my knife in a hookers belly!
- Revex 1m
- NovaQuinn 1m
- Archer 5m
- Jaydon2317 12s
- Vera 15s https://twitter.com/dril/status/218160412510785536
- whatislove00 1h youtu.be/v0dUnoecoZ0
- ComradeNitro 1h
- barbiedoll 1m
- tachi 1m
- Storm 10m
- Dumpster 21s
- Halyon 2s
- Lionion 5s Within cells, interlinked.
- PriceCheck 17s
- Baron17 9m
- Gracchus 2h trapped on a boat to hell
- Mephibosheth 18s
- Sara 3h
- Supermarket 7m Sleep is a sexy lover.
- Pomegranate 9s
- Oberst 7m
- Barrien 2m
- geoux 23s
- Vivvykins 3m
- FairyBlue 17m
- Jade1202 16m
- deepBlue 2s
- FancyPenguin 1m
- jsmith225 1m
j Johnny 9h New Code Written Nightly. Not a GM.
- NimbleZone 1m
a Cerberus 1m Head Builder & GM when I need to
- SacredWest 2m
And 25 more hiding and/or disguised
Connect to Sindome @ moo.sindome.org:5555 or just Play Now

Node Security Limits
Cracking you're own nodes

Right now it is possible, and even easy, for a decker to secure a node they are working on so well that they just can't get back in. It seems a bit odd since they WROTE the security in the first place and I think it is unlikely that they would unintentionally do so in a way that locks themselves out.

With tat in mind, I'd like to propose a command that, when toggled on, limits how well the decker will secure a node. maybe call it @backdoor or something. The idea is that when a decker secures a node with this option enabled they will be unable to place a security level on a node than is higher than what their stats/skills will allow them to crack.

If a decker just doesn't care if they can access that node again and just wants to lay down the best security they can, they just disable the option and they secure the node like usual (without taking their cracking ability into account).

I've always thought that failing that skill check is a -very- hard punishment. If that happens, you pretty much permanently lose control (or for a ridiculously long time at least) over a node even with a sizeable sum of UE spent on the appropriate stats & skills.

It makes new deckers useless due to the fact that a completely locked down node offers no replayability since nobody but wizads can get into them. It'd be better that if the skill check was failed, the security is set incredibly low instead of high; making the node vulnerable to attacks instead of actually giving a node more protection.

Shows what I know! I had always assumed that the locking yourself out thing was a result of doing too well on a roll. I had no idea it was the result of a major failure.

I agree though, I'd rather see a major failure leave a node wide open to cracking than see the node get crazy secured. Thanks for educating me!

It's what I assume happens anyway, but I won't got into detail. Anyway, I think cnodell's suggestion would be good as well, it'd give Grid 2.0 much more replayability until we get 3.0.