Existing players used to logging in with their character name and moo password must signup for a website account.
- whatislove 2m wisdom here
- pjbuchan 1m
a Mench 26m Doing a bit of everything.
- Mindhunter 25s
- Ociex 30s Brownies for the win.
- Enven 3m
- yomj 2m
- Mirielle 2s
- PsycoticCone 10m
- Frozenpizza 3s
- Raven 1h I lost myself, in the dark charade.
- Sulfurado 9s
a Kard 53m
- AdamBlue9000 14s Rolling 526d6 damage against both of us.
- Pladdicus 10m uh
- Euclid 31s
- AntiqueBeast 43m White grace, hidden in the dark.
And 22 more hiding and/or disguised
Sindome
a cyberpunk roleplaying game
banner art by Grand Failure
Connect to Sindome @ moo.sindome.org:5555 or just Play Now
  • BgBB
  • Ideas
  • The Great Chic Debate
  • Conflict between Attractiveness & Clothing scores

The Great Chic Debate
Conflict between Attractiveness & Clothing scores

Login to post. Membership required.
Jump To
Newest Post
Continuing from https://www.sindome.org/bgbb/game-discussion/new-game-features/substance-from-yo-style–scoring-attire-320/#last

Background: Chic+ clothing score covers up attractiveness adjective, which causes conflicting goals of Charisma investment vs. Clothing Score investment.

Idea: What if the cover-up scaled per clothing level?

For example…

Well-dressed: Hides Good-looking adjective only.

Chic: Hides Attractive & Good-looking.

Whatever's 1 above Chic: Hides Winsome, Attractive & Good-looking

etc.

This way, your clothing score has to meet a threshold for disguising purposes, plus people who have invested UE into Charisma don't see their outward investment disappeared.

By alittlelonger 0
You are making assumptions about how these descriptors are arrayed in relation to each other that aren't necessarily true. Different characters also have different ability to tell things about clothing, so you may be short information.
By PCow 0
What do you propose then?
By alittlelonger 0
Jump To Oldest Post