Existing players used to logging in with their character name and moo password must signup for a website account.
- Mikael 8s youtu.be/WM33Hr94SKw
- Chika 3m
- Tanin_Guest 27m [The Drome]
- Immuneknight 41s
- Pladdicus 18s uh
- Terrible_the_duck 16m
- whatislove 8m reputation is whoever holds a bigger gun
- Rillem 4m Make it personal.
- AntiqueBeast 9m White grace, hidden in the dark.
- Wulf 33s
- BeforeTheWhispers 3m
- zxq 1m Tools: https://ansicolortool.neocities.org
- Fay 33m
- Ociex 5m Brownies for the win.
And 27 more hiding and/or disguised
Connect to Sindome @ moo.sindome.org:5555 or just Play Now

The Great Chic Debate
Conflict between Attractiveness & Clothing scores

Continuing from https://www.sindome.org/bgbb/game-discussion/new-game-features/substance-from-yo-style–scoring-attire-320/#last

Background: Chic+ clothing score covers up attractiveness adjective, which causes conflicting goals of Charisma investment vs. Clothing Score investment.

Idea: What if the cover-up scaled per clothing level?

For example…

Well-dressed: Hides Good-looking adjective only.

Chic: Hides Attractive & Good-looking.

Whatever's 1 above Chic: Hides Winsome, Attractive & Good-looking

etc.

This way, your clothing score has to meet a threshold for disguising purposes, plus people who have invested UE into Charisma don't see their outward investment disappeared.

You are making assumptions about how these descriptors are arrayed in relation to each other that aren't necessarily true. Different characters also have different ability to tell things about clothing, so you may be short information.
What do you propose then?