Existing players used to logging in with their character name and moo password must signup for a website account.
- Thia 5s
- AdamBlue9000 35s Rolling 526d6 damage against both of us.
- Burgerwolf 2m PANCAKES
- Ociex 7s Brownies for the win.
- Mikael 3s A soul cant be cut.
- hex 4s
- Rillem 5m Make it personal.
- SmokePotion 2s Right or wrong, I'm getting high.
- PainFeeler 6s
- Raven 11m I lost myself, in the dark charade.
a Mench 2h Doing a bit of everything.
- zxq 16m Tools: https://ansicolortool.neocities.org
- Vanashis 3h
- whatislove 27m
- Pladdicus 6m uh
- Sivartas 3s
And 28 more hiding and/or disguised
Connect to Sindome @ moo.sindome.org:5555 or just Play Now

The Great Chic Debate
Conflict between Attractiveness & Clothing scores

Continuing from https://www.sindome.org/bgbb/game-discussion/new-game-features/substance-from-yo-style–scoring-attire-320/#last

Background: Chic+ clothing score covers up attractiveness adjective, which causes conflicting goals of Charisma investment vs. Clothing Score investment.

Idea: What if the cover-up scaled per clothing level?

For example…

Well-dressed: Hides Good-looking adjective only.

Chic: Hides Attractive & Good-looking.

Whatever's 1 above Chic: Hides Winsome, Attractive & Good-looking

etc.

This way, your clothing score has to meet a threshold for disguising purposes, plus people who have invested UE into Charisma don't see their outward investment disappeared.

You are making assumptions about how these descriptors are arrayed in relation to each other that aren't necessarily true. Different characters also have different ability to tell things about clothing, so you may be short information.
What do you propose then?