(Edited by Baguette at 8:03 am on 6/8/2026)
I saw this used today on a disguised person.
I know this is a touchy subject for some, but I saw a coded advantage that doesn't seem quite fair in comparison with all other shortdescs today.
Several days ago, I recall seeing an OOC shout that furniture and such would become locked on someone being evicted. Wouldn't this potentially have the drawback of pads could theoretically eventually get to where they have all the furniture they need, resulting in people not needing to purchase furniture (either new or second-hand), and thus stagnating that part of the economy?
There's other areas of play that could be heavily affected by this change too, I feel. Can we get some idea as to why that change was made?