Existing players used to logging in with their character name and moo password must signup for a website account.
- Crooknose 16s
- PsycoticCone 19s
- Thia 1m
- Wulf 26s
- Fogchild1 55m
- Acupa 42s
- Burgerwolf 12m PANCAKES
- Frozenpizza 3m
- Sulfurado 3s
- Raven 1h I lost myself, in the dark charade.
- Rillem 4m Make it personal.
- Mikael 25s A soul cant be cut.
a Mench 4h Doing a bit of everything.
- Selly 7h
- Fay 5h
- Pladdicus 7m uh
- Sivartas 5h
- zxq 1h Tools: https://ansicolortool.neocities.org
And 14 more hiding and/or disguised
Connect to Sindome @ moo.sindome.org:5555 or just Play Now

1st Neuralink Human Participant
There is no spoon

Noland Arbaugh is the first human to have a Neuralink device implanted in his brain. He talks about his experience in this podcast.

https://youtu.be/Kbk9BiPhm7o?si=uIE5Dx6OVOLQqifv&t=24539

I went to a pretty interesting talk a while ago on the topic of brain interfaces and ethics surrounding brain data, and while it was recorded I unfortunately haven't been able to figure out where or if it was actually posted online… however I did find a talk by one of the same speakers (Prof. Jennifer Chandler), hosted a few years ago that covered similar ethics topics and also some pretty relevant (to our themes about cloning and mind capture and death) discussion about death determination.

Ethical & Legal Issues with the Brain-Based Definition of Death from an Organ Donation Perspective. Jennifer Chandler, Faculty of Law – Common Law Section, University of Ottawa & Christy Simpson, Department of Bioethics, Dalhousie University & Canadian Blood Services.

And I find it 30 seconds after posting that.

The Law and Ethics of Reading the Mind from Brain Data.

Musk’s Neuralink recently announced a trial of its implanted brain-computer interface (BCI) will start soon in Toronto. BCIs and other devices that monitor and decode brain activity offer promising possibilities for people with severe motor disabilities, including people unable to communicate. This is not all that is now being done with the interpretation of brain activity data – in some places, this data is being used in criminal investigations to identify guilty knowledge.

A host of questions are now arising about the nature of the link between brain activity data and mental states, and whether privacy laws and concepts are up to the task of a future in which we access the mind in this new way.